Climate and Ice Ages
Modulation of ice ages via precessionand dust-albedo feedbacks
Dust, albedo, and the pace of the ice ages
Ralph Ellis and Michael Palmer
Geoscience Frontiers, volume 7, issue 6, pages 891–909. DOI 10.1016/j.gsf.2016.04.004.
A 2016 paper with Michael Palmer. Late-Pleistocene ice ages, they argue, are paced by precession and regulated by dusty ice sheets. Carbon dioxide is not, in their account, the main feedback.
The question
The standard Milankovitch account uses precession to pace the ice ages. The paper says this does not explain the long intervals between interglacials. It asks what holds a glaciation in place, and what finally ends it.
What the paper states
The published abstract says that the high albedo of the northern ice sheets keeps global temperature and carbon dioxide down through a glacial, even when a later precession maximum would otherwise warm the north. It says atmospheric carbon dioxide falls to about 200 parts per million, forests and grasslands die back, and the eroded soil becomes dust. That dust lands on the ice. At the next rise in northern sunlight, the darker ice melts.
The journal’s own highlights name precession as the forcing and albedo as the feedback. They say the dust is produced because carbon dioxide is low. Those are the authors’ claims in a reviewed paper. They are not a consensus finding.
His reading of it
Ellis has put the same point in plainer words: that carbon dioxide is only a small player in the temperature, and that the main ice-age feedback is dusty ice sheets. He has also said that he has not seen the argument refuted. Both sentences are his summary. They are not a finding added by the journal.
Ellis, R., & Palmer, M. (2016). Modulation of ice ages via precession and dust-albedo feedbacks. Geoscience Frontiers, 7(6), 891–909. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2016.04.004. This page summarises the paper. It does not reproduce it.
Evidence library
Sources
- Ellis, R., & Palmer, M. (2016). Modulation of ice ages via precession and dust-albedo feedbacks. Geoscience Frontiers, 7(6), 891–909. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2016.04.004.